Who are landowners?
The Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) makes provision
for compensation for mining activities to be paid to “owners”
of land, referred to here as landowners. This web page deals only
with compensation for landowners not native title holders (or claimants).
Click here
for information about compensation for native title holders (or claimants).
The definition of “owner” of land is set out in the
Schedule to the MRA and includes:
- a registered owner of freehold land;
- the holder of land under a lease or occupancy granted by the
State (but not occupation rights under a permit under the Land
Act 1994); and
- various entities with powers of management or control of specified
reserves, leases or grants of land.
|
| When
are landowners compensated? |
Landowners can be compensated
for the impact of mining activities on their land. In the case of
mining claims and mining leases, compensation is determined before
the tenure is granted. Compensation for activities under a mining
lease can be reviewed if there is a material change in circumstances
for the mining lease, such as a change to the mining method. Compensation
for the impact of activities under prospecting permits, exploration
permits and mineral development leases can be recovered after the
damage or injury is suffered or the loss is incurred by the landowner.
|
| What can landowners
be compensated for? |
| For activities under
prospecting permits, exploration permits and mineral development
licences, landowners can be compensated for the damage or injury
suffered or the loss incurred.
For activities under mining claims and mining leases, the landowner
is entitled to compensation for (an extract of sections 281(3) and
(4) of the MRA follows):
“281 Determination of compensation by tribunal
…
(3) Upon an application made under subsection (1),
the tribunal shall settle the amount of compensation an owner of
land is entitled to as compensation for—
(a) in the case of compensation referred to in section 279—
(i) deprivation of possession of the surface of land of the
owner;
(ii) diminution of the value of the land of the owner or any
improvements thereon;
(iii) diminution of the use made or which may be made of the
land of the owner or any improvements thereon;
(iv) severance of any part of the land from other parts thereof
or from other land of the owner;
(v) any surface rights of access;
(vi) all loss or expense that arises;
as a consequence of the grant or renewal of the mining lease;
and
(b) in the case of compensation referred to in section 280—
(i) diminution of the value of the land of the owner or any
improvements thereon;
(ii) diminution of the use made or which may be made of the
land of the owner or any improvements thereon;
(iii) all loss or expense that arises;
as a consequence of the grant or renewal of the mining lease.
(4) In assessing the amount of compensation payable
under subsection (3)—
(a) where it is necessary for the owner of land to obtain replacement
land of a similar productivity, nature and area or resettle himself
or herself or relocate his or her livestock and other chattels
on other parts of his or her land or on the replacement land,
all reasonable costs incurred or likely to be incurred by the
owner in obtaining replacement land, the owner’s resettlement
and the relocation of the owner’s livestock or other chattels
as at the date of the assessment shall be considered;
(b) no allowance shall be made for any minerals that are or may
be on or under the surface of the land concerned;
(c) if the owner of land proves that the status and use currently
being made (prior to the application for the grant of the mining
lease) of certain land is such that a premium should be applied—an
appropriate amount of compensation may be determined;
(d) loss that arises may include loss of profits to the owner
calculated by comparison of the usage being made of land prior
to the lodgement of the relevant application for the grant of
a mining lease and the usage that could be made of that land after
the grant;
(e) an additional amount shall be determined to reflect the compulsory
nature of action taken under this part which amount, together
with any amount determined pursuant to paragraph (c), shall be
not less than 10% of the aggregate amount determined under subsection
(3).
… .”
|
| Where can I get advice about
compensation? |
| Valuers can assist landowners to
assess the impact of mining activities on the land. Lawyers can
assist landowners to formulate, negotiate and present their claim
for compensation.
|
| Does compensation have to
be determined by the LRT? |
| Landowners and miners can enter into
compensation agreements without the matter coming before the LRT.
Compensation agreements for mining claims and mining leases must
be in writing, signed by both parties, filed in the office of the
Mining Registrar and stamped, (if stamping is required under Queensland
law). Enquiries about stamping should be made to the Office
of State Revenue.
|
| What is the effect of a compensation
agreement? |
| As well as being an agreement between
the parties, it is a condition of all mining leases that the miner
makes all compensation payments and complies with all the terms
of any compensation agreement.
|
| How can I find out what compensation
has been paid in the past? |
| All the LRT’s compensation
determinations are available under the Decisions page on the LRT’s
website. Click here to access
the Decisions page.
|
| How do compensation matters
come to the Tribunal? |
| Either the landowner or the miner
can apply to the Mining Registrar to have the LRT determine compensation.
The Mining Registrar can also refer the matter to the LRT if the
parties have not filed a compensation agreement within 3 months
of the events specified in section 279(5) MRA, in the case of a
mining lease and section 85(12) MRA, in the case of a mining claim.
|
| Can compensation be mediated? |
Either party can make a request through
a Tribunal officer for the matter to be sent to mediation. That
request will be dealt with by the Member to which the matter has
been allocated. They may convene a directions hearing to deal with
the request or, if there is agreement between the parties, may make
an order “on the papers”.
|
| Does there have to be a compensation
hearing? |
| The Tribunal has implemented a procedure
to enable smaller compensation matters to be dealt with on the papers.
Click here
to access the Flow Chart for Landholder compensation for mining
tenures, which includes information about the process. Unless either
party requests a hearing or the LRT considers a hearing is necessary,
compensation matters will be dealt with “on the papers”.
|
| What orders can the Tribunal
make in compensation determinations? |
If an application is made or a matter
is referred to the LRT for a determination of compensation for a
mining lease or mining claim, the LRT may determine the amounts
and the terms, conditions and times when payments aggregating the
total compensation is payable. Some landowners are more interested
in the miner doing specified works that will assist with their property
management or would like conditions imposed about how the miner
will undertake the mining activities. If the landowner has objected
to the grant of a mining lease, the LRT can certainly recommend
the lease be granted on conditions that take such matters into account.
Alternatively, the miner and landowner can enter into a compensation
agreement that deals with such matters and compliance with the compensation
agreement is a condition of the lease. However, the LRT cannot impose
such conditions as part of the compensation determination. Once
the matter is left to the LRT to determine, the LRT can only make
an award in monetary terms and make orders about how and when the
compensation is to be paid.
|
|
|
| |
| |